Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines how ventures pivot between commercial and defense sectors, suggesting new adaptations for success.
Ventures operating at the intersection of commercial innovation and government procurement face a strategic puzzle: pivoting is commonly portrayed as a rapid, feedback-driven process, yet in dual-use sectors firms must reorient their business models in environments where market feedback is opaque, delayed, or inaccessible. This study examines how established U.S.-based space ventures pivot across the commercial–defense boundary. Drawing on comparative case studies of Long Wall, Voyager Technologies, and Palantir Technologies, we inductively develop a two-by-two pivot typology based on pivot direction (commercial-to-defense versus defense-to-commercial) and pivot model (clean versus hybrid), and identify four capabilities that enable these transitions: internal readiness, strategic market fluidity, infrastructural alignment, and temporal synchronization. Across cases, we find that successful dual-use pivots do not unfold through iterative responses to market signals but through anticipatory capability sequencing and institutional adaptation. More surprisingly, this pattern emerges in both pivot directions, including defense-to-commercial expansion, where experimentation would normally be expected to dominate. Our findings identify a distinct mode of strategic adaptation in regulated, state-mediated markets that complements feedback-centric accounts of entrepreneurial change and offers implications for research on entrepreneurial strategy and dynamic capabilities, as well as for founders, investors, and policymakers navigating dual-use innovation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vittori et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: