Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Assesses combustion efficiency and emissions in coal-RDF-ammonia blends, suggesting a low-carbon transition pathway.
Coal-fired power generation remains a major source of anthropogenic greenhouse-gas emissions, motivating low-carbon co-firing strategies compatible with existing infrastructure. This study presents an integrated thermodynamic and environmental assessment of a ternary coal–RDF–ammonia co-firing system, combining Aspen Plus equilibrium simulation, second-law exergy analysis based on the Szargut–Styrylska correlation, and Response Surface Methodology (RSM) optimization. Twelve blend compositions spanning a wide range of coal, refuse-derived fuel (RDF), and ammonia fractions were evaluated. A validated optimum blend was identified that simultaneously maximizes combustion-chamber exergetic efficiency and minimizes equilibrium CO2, SOx, and NOx emissions relative to a pure-coal baseline. The RSM model achieved excellent statistical fit and identified the directional sensitivity of efficiency to the RDF and ammonia content. A key trade-off is identified between thermodynamic performance and kinetic NOx risk: ammonia-rich blends improve equilibrium-based efficiency but may increase real kinetic NOx formation, requiring advanced combustion control for safe industrial deployment. These findings position ternary co-firing as a promising transitional decarbonization pathway for the existing coal fleet.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chavando et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: