Demonstrates effective safety distance estimation in power operations, suggesting improved worker safety.
Real-time estimation of the safety distance between power operation workers and energized equipment is essential for preventing electric shock, arc flash injury, and equipment accidents during live or near-energized operations. However, large-scale deployment remains difficult because conventional binocular ranging systems require accurate offline calibration, while monocular vision suffers from metric-scale ambiguity. This paper proposes a weakly calibrated multi-camera vision framework for safety distance estimation in power operation scenes. First, a cross-camera tracking strategy combining mask-guided ReID features, Kalman filtering, spatio-temporal constraints, and Hungarian matching is developed to maintain globally consistent worker identities. Second, a region-wise self-supervised depth estimation model is introduced: photometric consistency is imposed within worker regions, while cross-view feature reprojection is imposed within rigid equipment regions. Intrinsic parameter regularization and scene-inherent dimensional priors are then used to recover metric scale without placing additional calibration targets. Third, the YOLOv8-seg backbone is enhanced with a CNN-Transformer C2f_CT module to improve pixel-level segmentation of workers, energized equipment, and structural components under cluttered backgrounds. Experiments on three representative power operation scenarios show that the proposed method achieves 92.3% MOTA, 94.2% Rank-1 accuracy, 82.0% mAP, 8.7% relative distance error, and 22 FPS end-to-end speed. When using five-frame smoothing and uncertainty threshold, the proposed method can achieve 98.7% warning precision, 0.9% missed alarm rate and 1.3% false alarm rate. The results indicate that the proposed framework provides a practical balance between deployment cost, geometric accuracy, and real-time warning capability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: