Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article rethinks political subjectivation and power asymmetries through territorial conflicts in Southern Italy, highlighting implications for governance.
This article reconceptualises territory as a historically situated configuration of power relations — not as a neutral administrative container or cultural repository, but as a field where domination, resistance, and subject formation are constitutively intertwined. Drawing on conflicts in Southern Italy — migrant labour struggles and disputes over large-scale energy infrastructures — we examine territorial conflict as generative: a process through which underlying power asymmetries become visible and contestable. Political subjectivities emerge contingently within such conflicts, yet face systematic neutralisation through technocratic, legal, and administrative translation that depoliticises dissent without eliminating it. The central problem is not conflict's disappearance but its reconfiguration under neoliberal governance. We trace how territory, conflict, and subjectivation operate together to both reproduce and contest asymmetries of power, arguing that territorial conflict constitutes a distinctive form of non-institutional political participation through which subordinate ac-tors challenge existing configurations of power.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nardis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: