Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates timing scalability in RISC-V frameworks, indicating implications for system performance under concurrency.
As RISC-V processors are increasingly considered for embedded real-time and control-oriented systems, evaluating how timing behavior changes under increasing task concurrency becomes essential. Adding runnable tasks can amplify preemptions, context-switch activity, response-time variability, execution jitter, and deadline pressure. Existing RISC-V simulation and virtual-platform environments mainly target architectural exploration, functional validation, or full-system execution, and do not directly provide a controlled workflow for isolating scheduler-induced timing degradation across large configuration spaces. This paper presents nSim-RV, a configurable and reproducible RISC-V simulation and orchestration framework for scheduler-aware timing scalability evaluation. The framework combines automated campaign generation, deterministic workload configuration, structured dataset aggregation, duplicate validation, and timing-oriented metric extraction. The evaluation compares a standard shared-pipeline execution model with an nMPRA-inspired preserved-context mode under identical scheduler and workload conditions. The campaign includes CoreMark, Dhrystone, and a deterministic synthetic RT-Control workload, 2–32 concurrent tasks, 50 k–1 M cycle observation windows, cache-disabled and cache-enabled configurations, and four-stage and five-stage pipeline organizations, resulting in 864 validated configurations. Results show that increasing task concurrency amplifies timing variability and deadline pressure. Preserved-context execution reduces switching-induced disturbance and delays or reduces higher-pressure timing behavior in several trajectories. Under the five-stage cache-disabled RT-Control configuration at N = 32, it reduces the deadline miss ratio from 3.74% to 2.21%, corresponding to a 41.1% relative reduction, with the clearest benefits observed for Dhrystone and RT-Control at intermediate–high task counts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iuga et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: