Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional and prospective analyses reveal that lower NCCR increases the risk of Circadian Syndrome in older adults, indicating its potential as a serum indicator.
BACKGROUND: Evidence on the association between the normalized creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio (NCCR) and Circadian Syndrome (CircS) in the general population remains scarce. This study aimed to investigate this relationship using data from middle-aged and elderly participants in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 5,981 participants (2011 wave) and a prospective cohort analysis of 2,053 participants (2015 wave, median follow-up 4.0 years). CircS was defined as a cluster including elevated blood pressure, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, abdominal obesity, depression, and abnormal sleep duration. RESULTS: During follow-up, 552 participants developed incident CircS. A significant inverse association was observed: the risk of new-onset CircS progressively decreased with higher baseline NCCR levels. After adjusting for multiple confounders, each standard deviation increase in NCCR was associated with a 40% reduced odds of CircS (adjusted odds ratio = 0.60, 95% confidence interval: 0.48 to 0.75). Subgroup and dose-response analyses confirmed the robustness of this inverse relationship. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, a lower NCCR is independently associated with an elevated risk of developing CircS. These findings support NCCR's role as a practical serum indicator of sarcopenia and implicate muscle loss as a potentially key underlying pathway in the pathogenesis of Circadian Syndrome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: