Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Assesses business intelligence adoption factors in Jordanian banks, highlighting critical components for successful implementation.
Purpose The current research investigates the factors affecting “Business Intelligence” (BI) adoption in Jordanian commercial banks by integrating the “Technology–Organization–Environment” (TOE) framework with the “Technology Acceptance Model” (TAM). Design/methodology/approach Survey data from 290 senior and mid-level IT professionals were analyzed to examine the effects of technological “relative advantage, complexity, compatibility,” organizational “readiness, top management support” and environmental “vendor support, competitive pressure” factors on BI adoption. Findings Results show that “compatibility, top management support, relative advantage, competitive pressure, and vendor support” significantly promote BI adoption, while complexity negatively affects “perceived usefulness” (PU) and “perceived ease of use.” Organizational readiness showed no significant impact. PU emerged as the strongest predictor of adoption intention. Originality/value By validating an integrated TAM–TOE model, the research paper highlights the importance of technological alignment, leadership support and intuitive BI design, providing practical insights for policymakers and banking professionals to enhance digital transformation and competitiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aldarabah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: