Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores how translation shapes the representation of Dalit voices in Bengal, suggesting an ethics of caste-sensitive translation.
Translation mediates the ways Dalit voices are represented and misrepresented in postcolonial Bengal, where caste has long been obscured under bhadralok modernity and Marxist class discourse. Drawing on community periodicals such as Chhotolok-er Chithi and Dalit Mirror , Matua oral traditions and the writings of Manoranjan Byapari and Kalyani Thakur Charal, the study explores how vernacular expression is recoded through linguistic and epistemic translation. While translation enables visibility, it often domesticates Dalit experience within elite aesthetic and intellectual frameworks, muting its critical edge. Engaging postcolonial translation theory and Dalit epistemology, the argument foregrounds translation as a terrain of casteed power where voice, authority and knowledge are continually negotiated. An ethics of caste-sensitive translation is proposed—one attentive to the asymmetries of mediation that shape the articulation of subaltern experience in Bengal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asis Mistry (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: