Randomized trial demonstrates improved recognition performance in facial emotion recognition, suggesting effective feature integration.
Facial emotion recognition plays an important role in affective computing and human–computer interaction. Although convolutional neural network (CNN)-based methods have demonstrated remarkable performance, deep features alone may not sufficiently capture subtle geometric deformations and local texture variations, particularly under limited training data and challenging real-world conditions. To address this limitation, this study proposes a hybrid framework that integrates CNN-based deep features with handcrafted geometric and texture features. Specifically, 17 landmark-based angular features extracted from the eyebrows, eyes, nose, and mouth are combined with histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) features extracted from the nose and mouth regions through feature-level concatenation. The proposed method was extensively evaluated on three controlled datasets (JAFFE, CK+, and KDEF) and two large-scale in-the-wild datasets (RAF-DB and AffectNet). Five-fold cross-validation, leave-one-subject-out cross-validation, statistical significance analysis using paired t-tests, computational efficiency analysis, and comparisons with conventional handcrafted methods, standard CNN models, transfer learning-based methods, and recent hybrid feature-fusion methods were performed to comprehensively validate the proposed approach. Experimental results demonstrated consistent improvements across different datasets, evaluation protocols, and CNN backbone networks while maintaining a favorable balance between recognition performance and computational efficiency. These findings demonstrate that handcrafted geometric and local texture features effectively complement CNN-based deep representations, providing a robust and generalizable framework for facial emotion recognition across both controlled and large-scale in-the-wild datasets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: