Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Uncovers the specificity of DNA-ADPr hydrolases in recognizing nucleotide modifications, suggesting fundamental insights into DNA damage response.
ADP-ribosylation (ADPr), long recognized as a canonical protein post-translational modification, has recently expanded to include targeting nucleic acids, uncovering a diverse landscape of noncanonical biological functions. Emerging evidence suggests that ADPr at the 5′-phosphate terminus of DNA is implicated in the DNA damage response, yet understanding its precise molecular function has been hampered by the lack of structurally defined chemical probes. Here, we report the stereoselective synthesis of deoxynucleotide-phospho-ADPr (dN-P-ADPr) probes, representing native fragments of terminal DNA-ADPr. Our strategy leverages a mild, stereocontrolled glycosylation to construct the challenging ribosyl-phosphate linkage, followed by P(III)–P(V) coupling to establish the pyrophosphate bridge. This robust toolkit enabled the systematic biochemical profiling of DNA-ADPr hydrolases across diverse kingdoms of life. Remarkably, using these newly developed probes, we uncover hydrolases across the diversity of life capable of reversing ADPr modifications at phosphorylated DNA ends. We further show that these enzymes exhibit an absolute preference for the native-like α-anomer, independent of the identity of the adjacent DNA nucleobase, suggesting that substrate recognition is governed primarily by the ADPr-phosphate linkages rather than the local nucleobase context. Together, these synthetic probes and biochemical insights provide an essential foundation for deciphering the biological landscape of noncanonical ADPr.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: