Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares carbon emissions from gasoline cars, gasoline SAVs, and electric SAVs, indicating significant benefits of electrification.
This study compares the environmental impacts of three urban transport scenarios: private gasoline vehicles, gasoline-powered shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs), and electric SAVs. Using deterministic modelling, Monte Carlo simulation (5000 iterations), analysis of variance, and t-tests, the authors quantify per-capita carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions under varying occupancy, fuel consumption, and grid carbon intensity. Private gasoline cars with low occupancy (1.2 persons/vehicle) produce ≈15 000 g carbon dioxide per 100 km. Gasoline SAVs reduce emissions by ≈66% due to higher occupancy (2.5 persons) and better fuel efficiency. Electric SAVs achieve as low as 640 g carbon dioxide per 100 km, a 96% reduction against private gasoline vehicles, including indirect grid emissions (200 g CO2/kWh). Sensitivity analysis shows gasoline SAVs depend on fuel use and occupancy, while electric SAVs depend primarily on grid carbon intensity. Limitations include fixed occupancy assumptions, idealised routeing, empty-vehicle miles exclusion, and missing upstream emissions for gasoline vehicles. Full life-cycle assessment is absent. Nevertheless, combining shared mobility with electrification offers maximum urban transport decarbonisation, providing actionable insights for policymakers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ebrahimzadeh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: