Evaluates supply chain resilience in Hubei’s new energy vehicle industry, suggesting strategies for improvement.
Under the “dual carbon” goals (carbon peak and carbon neutrality), the new energy vehicle (NEV) industry has become a strategic focus of great-power competition, and the resilience of its international supply chain is critical to industrial security and development initiatives. As a traditional automobile manufacturing hub in China, Hubei Province faces increasingly prominent global risks in its supply chain during the transition to NEVs; scientifically evaluating and enhancing its international supply chain resilience is therefore of great practical significance. Drawing on supply chain resilience theory, this paper constructs an evaluation index system comprising 18 specific indicators across four dimensions: robustness, redundancy, agility, and innovativeness. To overcome the limitations of a single weighting method, a combined subjective and objective weighting approach that integrates the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the entropy weight method was employed to determine indicator weights. Subsequently, the TOPSIS model was applied to measure the supply chain resilience level of Hubei Province from 2018 to 2025, with horizontal comparisons conducted against Shanghai and Guangdong. Finally, an obstacle degree model was introduced to quantitatively diagnose the key factors constraining resilience improvement. The results indicate that the international supply chain resilience of Hubei’s NEV industry has shown a continuous upward trend. By 2025, it ranks in the first tier alongside Guangdong (with closeness coefficients of 0.8180 and 0.8181, respectively), approaching the level of Shanghai. Weaknesses are concentrated primarily in the agility dimension, while upstream resource dependence remains a salient issue within the robustness dimension. “External dependence on key raw materials,” “average recovery time from logistics disruptions,” and “level of supply chain information sharing” are still the top three obstacle factors. Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) further reveals that low resource autonomy and slow logistics recovery are core conditions leading to low resilience, and the coupling of multiple obstacle factors amplifies the risk transmission effect. Based on this, this study proposes optimization recommendations focusing on foundation strengthening and chain consolidation, digital chain connectivity, and innovation–chain integration, in order to enhance the resilience of the international supply chain for new energy vehicles in Hubei. This research provides a methodological reference for evaluating the supply chain resilience of regionally distinctive industries and offers a quantitative basis for Hubei Province and related enterprises to formulate targeted improvement strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: