Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved defect quantification in industrial tools, highlighting its reliability under noise conditions.
Tool micro-defect quantification is often degraded by optical sampling limits, boundary aliasing, and non-Gaussian industrial noise. To improve segmentation fidelity and physical measurement reliability, this study proposes a physically guided reconstruction and metrology framework for milling tool defects. The framework first uses an improved ResNet18-BiFPN segmentation network supervised by a distance transform-based boundary-aware loss, which encourages mask boundaries to fit high-curvature crack and chipping regions. A tensor-guided elliptical adaptive structuring element is then introduced to restore local topology while preserving tangential connectivity and normal boundary fidelity. Finally, a stable edge region search and curvature-adaptive gray/Zernike moment fusion strategy are used for noise-robust sub-pixel localization and physical area quantification. Image-based evaluation and controlled simulation-based stress tests show that the proposed method achieves an mIoU of 92.5%, an F1-score of 97.1%, and an HD95 of 2.15 pixels. Under strong synthetic noise, the average distance error remains below 0.28 pixels. For micro-defect area measurement, the mean relative error is reduced to approximately 1.7%. These results indicate that the proposed framework can support more reliable defect metrology for tool condition monitoring under complex industrial imaging conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: