Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates sealing performance of rubber rings under extreme conditions, indicating material choices matter.
Sealing rings are widely used in drilling and completion tools, but they are prone to performance degradation under combined high-temperature, high-pressure, and corrosive conditions, leading to sealing failure and leakage. This study investigates the high-temperature corrosion and high-pressure sealing performance of three sealing rings with identical specifications but different material systems: a fluorine rubber ring and two perfluoroether rubber rings, designated as S-FKM, S-FFKM-1, and S-FFKM-2. High-temperature corrosion tests were conducted, and the evolution of material properties was evaluated through systematic characterization of changes in morphology, mass, and hardness before and after corrosion. High-pressure sealing performance was further assessed using a specialized fixture, with sealing reliability determined by monitoring pressure variations. The S-FFKM-2 ring exhibited no cracking at 232 °C, with a mass change of 0.22 % and a hardness variation below 2 Shore A, demonstrating superior high-temperature corrosion resistance. The S-FFKM-1 ring maintained a pressure of approximately 67 MPa after corrosion at 180 °C, indicating excellent high-pressure sealing performance. In contrast, S-FKM showed intermediate behavior in both corrosion and sealing tests, reflecting a more balanced overall performance. The outstanding performance of S-FFKM-2 is attributed to its high tetrafluoroethylene content, while the high perfluoroalkyl vinyl ether and carbon black content in S-FFKM-1 contributes to its superior sealing capability. These findings provide valuable guidance for the selection of materials for high-temperature downhole sealing applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: