Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares immune activation in young men after high and low-intensity resistance exercise, suggesting intensity is crucial for immune response.
Purpose Acute physical exercise triggers a transient immune response. For endurance exercise, these effects are intensity-dependent. In contrast, the role of exercise intensity in resistance exercise (RE) and its contribution to immune modulation remains less understood. This randomised crossover trial aims to compare the acute effects of High-Intensity Interval Resistance Exercise (HIIRE) versus Low-Intensity Resistance Exercise (LIRE) on routine clinical cellular inflammatory markers—neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII)—in 24 healthy, RE-trained young men. Methods Measurements were taken at baseline (T 0 ), immediately post-exercise (T 1 ), and 45 min post-exercise (T 2 ). It was hypothesised that HIIRE would elicit a significantly greater increase in NLR, PLR, and SII from baseline (T 0 ) to post-exercise (T 1 and T 2 ) compared to LIRE. Results Baseline-adjusted ANCOVAs revealed significant interactions for cellular inflammatory markers ( η 2 p = .072; NLR: p < .001, η 2 p = .217; PLR: p < .001, η 2 p = .147; SII: p < .001, η 2 p = .204). Post hoc analyses locate this difference for NLR, PLR, and SII 45 min post-exercise, with greater increases of HIIRE. Conclusion The results suggest a complex immune response involving pro-inflammatory signalling and immune cell redistribution induced by acute RE, with intensity being a main driver. This underscores the pivotal role of intensity in modulating acute immune responses to RE, with potential implications for exercise prescription targeting inflammatory processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fabritius et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: