Randomized trial evaluates meat quality in e-commerce shipping, indicating improved practices for better consumer experience.
This study aimed to identify the impact of multiple shipping factors on beef quality attributes. Boneless striploins ( n = 5) were wet‐aged to 28 d postmortem, cut into 2.54 cm thick steaks, and randomly assigned to 32 different shipping treatments, representing combinations of six two‐level factors: (1) Shipping Container Type (Polystyrene‐Foam vs. Biodegradable), (2) Coolant Type (Icepacks vs. Dry‐ice), (3) Ambient Temperature (Hot vs. Cold), (4) Shipping duration (1 Day vs. 3 Days), (5) Coolant Load (20% vs. 40%), and (6) Filler Usage (Filler vs. No‐filler). Each steak was vacuum‐packaged, frozen at –20°C and subjected to simulated shipping conditions. Samples were analyzed for pH, odor, color, cook loss, shear force, lipid oxidation, and microbial concentration. The experiment was replicated 3 times. The results indicated that ambient temperature, filler usage, and shipping duration had significant effects on meat quality ( p < 0.05). Coolant and container types were significant only when combined with other factors ( p < 0.05). Samples shipped in Hot and 3Days were observed to have higher ( p < 0.05) microbial concentrations than their respective counterparts. Greater redness was observed in meat samples shipped with fillers than those without ( p < 0.05). The results indicated that ambient temperature and shipping duration greatly influenced the meat quality attributes and suggested opportunities to optimize shipping practices for consumer use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dahunsi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: