Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Uncovers variations in forest carbon storage in mountain forests, indicating crucial ecological insights.
Forest aboveground live biomass carbon storage (hereafter referred to as “forest carbon storage”) is an important indicator of forest vegetation carbon sequestration, and its spatial patterns and associated factors are highly heterogeneous. Identifying these variations can improve the understanding of carbon accumulation in complex mountain forests and support fine-scale carbon assessment in similar ecosystems. The results showed the following. (1) The total forest carbon storage in the study area was 3.75 × 106 t C, with a carbon density of 44.83 t C·hm−2. Pinus massoniana and hard broad-leaved tree species were the main contributors, and carbon storage peaked at the mature forest stage. (2) Carbon storage exhibited significant spatial clustering (Moran’s I = 0.312), with high-value areas concentrated within the national nature reserve and low-value areas distributed in regions with frequent human activities. (3) The GWR model outperformed the ordinary least squares model, with R2 increasing to 0.88 and residual spatial autocorrelation reduced by 42.22%. (4) The positive effect of stand volume increased from northeast to southwest, the effect of stand age differed between eastern and western areas, and shrub layer height, soil depth, and slope exhibited region-specific positive and negative effects, with significant interactions among factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: