Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates the impact of emulsified asphalt content on pore structure and strength in mortar, suggesting optimal formulation for repair applications.
Ballastless-track filling-layer repair requires rapid strength development, deformation compatibility, and environmental resistance. This study investigated sulphoaluminate cement-emulsified asphalt (SEA) mortar prepared with two cationic emulsions having nominal solid contents of 60% and 50% at A/C = 0–0.6, where A/C denotes the as-received emulsion-to-cement mass ratio. At a fixed A/C, changing solid content simultaneously changes the calculated nonvolatile-residue contribution and emulsion-introduced water, so the observed behavior reflects their coupled influence. As A/C increased from 0 to 0.6, the 28-day compressive strength decreased from approximately 68 MPa to below 10 MPa, and the dynamic elastic modulus decreased from approximately 12 GPa to 4 GPa. For the 60% solid-content emulsion (EA-A), the integrated mercury-intruded volume increased from 0.113 to 0.245 mL/g and D 50 increased from 17.7 to 332.5 nm, indicating substantial coarsening of accessible pore entries. Higher A/C improved relative retention under low-high temperature and wet-dry cycling and reduced the chloride migration coefficient by up to 47.4%, but the high-A/C mixtures retained much lower absolute strength and stiffness. At the same A/C, EA-A generally exhibited a better balance of mechanical and environmental performance than the 50% solid-content emulsion (EA-B), consistent with more nonvolatile residue and less emulsion water. SEM and XRD observations linked the exposure-related strength evolution with phase precipitation, local cracking, and interfacial changes. Considering strength, stiffness, shrinkage, and environmental retention together, EA-A with A/C = 0.2–0.4 is proposed as a preliminary composition window, whereas A/C = 0.6 is not recommended for applications requiring high support capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: