Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates EDDS for eliminating smear layer and enhancing dentine integrity in dental procedures, suggesting environmental benefits.
Although EDTA remains the gold standard, concerns regarding its toxicity/environmental persistence have driven the search for bio-friendly alternatives. We evaluated the effect of EDDS on microhardness, smear layer, and dentine penetration of canal sealer. Two hundred and fifteen single-rooted teeth with round morphology were used. Samples were treated with solutions for 3 min. Vickers microhardness was analysed. Final irrigation was performed: GroupET: 17%-EDTA; GroupED:15%-EDDS; GroupET/N:17%-EDTA +2.5%-NaOCl; GroupED/N:15%-EDDS +2.5%-NaOCl; GroupC:distilled-water. The smear layer was evaluated. Canals were obturated using epoxy-resin and bioceramic-sealer. Dentine penetration was analysed using confocal microscopy. One-way-ANOVA, Student's t-test, Fisher-Freeman-Halton-exact, and Wilcoxon signed-rank-test were applied. EDTA and EDDS affected microhardness, smear layer, and dentine penetration similarly (p > 0.05). Dentine penetration was higher with the bioceramic-sealer and was enhanced by NaOCl (p < 0.05). EDDS demonstrated similar results to EDTA and represents a potentially more bio-friendly chelating approach that may support more biologically/environmentally conscious irrigation strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yanık et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: