Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pilot study evaluates transarterial microembolization, showing improved outcomes in patients with refractory plantar fasciitis, suggesting potential benefits.
Background/Objectives: Chronic plantar fasciitis refractory to conservative treatment remains a therapeutic challenge, and minimally invasive options targeting pathologic neovascularization are of growing interest. We evaluated the safety and early- to midterm clinical outcomes of transarterial microembolization in refractory plantar fasciitis, with emphasis on functional and patient-reported outcomes. Methods: In this single-center observational pilot study with ambispective data collection, 16 procedures in 13 patients were treated using imipenem/cilastatin. The primary outcome was pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS); secondary outcomes included the Foot Function Index (FFI), the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), analgesic use, return to activity, need for further treatment, and complications. Results: Technical success was 100%. Median NRS decreased from 10.0 at baseline to 3.0 at 1 month and 0.0 at 3 months, with significant improvement maintained through 18 months. Median FFI improved from 9.42 to near zero, and analgesic use declined. At 12 months, 90.9% of procedures reported clinical improvement. Reintervention was required once (6.3%); only minor complications occurred (12.5%), with no major events. Full return to normal activity was achieved in 68.8%. Conclusions: Transarterial microembolization was associated with rapid functional and patient-reported improvement and a favorable safety profile. These exploratory, hypothesis-generating findings warrant confirmation in controlled prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tuna et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: