Key result
Higher cardiac rehabilitation session attendance predicted increased odds of VO2 peak improvement (OR 1.04) and lower odds of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 0.97) in men, but not in women.
Why the study?
Women exhibit blunted VO2peak improvements following cardiac rehabilitation, prompting an examination of sex differences in clinical predictors of VO2peak improvement and MACE odds.
Does outpatient cardiac rehabilitation have sex-specific clinical predictors for VO2 peak improvement and MACE reduction in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Cohort (n=671)
No
Does outpatient cardiac rehabilitation have sex-specific clinical predictors for VO2 peak improvement and MACE reduction in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Cardiac rehabilitation attendance predicts improved exercise capacity and lower MACE risk in men, but not in women, highlighting the need for sex-specific tailoring of CR programs.
Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) leads to increased exercise capacity (VO 2 peak) and risk reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Women exhibit blunted VO 2 peak improvements following CR. The purpose was to examine sex differences in the clinical predictors of VO 2 peak improvement and odds of MACEs following CR. Methods From 1999 to 2017, all consecutive patients undergoing cardiopulmonary exercise testing before and after CR were included. Sex differences in peak exercise metrics in response to CR were compared. Multiple logistic regression models were fit to assess clinical predictors of VO 2 peak improvement (defined as >0% from pre‐CR) and MACEs following CR for men and women. Results A total of 513 men and 158 women were included. Men had greater increases in VO 2 peak than women following CR ( P =0.001). For men, independent predictors of VO 2 peak improvement following CR included higher CR session attendance (odds ratio [OR], 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02–1.06]), peripheral artery disease (OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.25–0.86]), and pre‐CR VO 2 peak (OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97–0.99]) (all, P <0.02). Independent predictors of lower odds of MACEs following CR in men included higher number of CR sessions (OR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.95–0.99]), pre‐CR VO 2 peak (OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97–0.99]), surgical CR indication (OR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.18–0.68]), and no history of peripheral artery disease (OR, 2.94 [95% CI, 1.60–5.38]) (all, P <0.02). For women, the selected clinical characteristics were not statistically significant independent predictors of VO 2 peak improvement or odds of MACEs (except for diabetes) following CR. Conclusions These findings suggest that clinical predictors of VO 2 peak improvement and odds of MACEs following CR are sex specific.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease requiring cardiac rehabilitation (n=671). Cardiac rehabilitation session attendance vs. Lower attendance / Female sex was evaluated on VO2 peak improvement (>0% from pre-CR) per 1 CR session attended in men (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06, p=0.001). Higher cardiac rehabilitation session attendance predicted increased odds of VO2 peak improvement (OR 1.04) and lower odds of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 0.97) in men, but not in women.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: