Key result
Only ~45% of HOCM patients paced for AV block after alcohol septal ablation remain pacemaker dependent.
Why the study?
Patients with HOCM undergoing ASA risk high-degree AV block requiring permanent pacemaker implantation, but long-term pacemaker dependency in this population remains unclear.
What is the rate of long-term pacemaker dependency in HOCM patients who receive a CIED for AV block after alcohol septal ablation?
Cohort (n=67)
What is the rate of long-term pacemaker dependency in HOCM patients who receive a CIED for AV block after alcohol septal ablation?
Long-term pacemaker dependency after alcohol septal ablation is unexpectedly low, suggesting AV conduction may recover and routine early device implantation could be reconsidered.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support selective CIED use post-ASA in HOCM; leaves open prospective validation of dependency rates.
Background Patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) undergoing alcohol septal ablation (ASA) are at risk for high-degree atrioventricular (AV) block, often requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. However, long-term pacemaker dependency in this population remains unclear. Methods We retrospectively analyzed HOCM patients who underwent ASA and subsequent implantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) due to procedure-related AV block between 2016 and 2023. CIED interrogation at ≥6 weeks post-implantation was used to assess ventricular pacing (VP). Pacemaker dependency was defined as >1% VP. Associations with baseline characteristics were examined using logistic regression. Results Of 464 patients undergoing ASA, 95 (20.5%) received a CIED, and 67 were available for follow-up. Only 30 patients (44.8%) showed >1% VP; 9 (13.4%) were completely dependent (100% VP). In contrast, 31 patients (46.3%) had ≤0.1% VP. Persistent AV block was more common in patients with pre-interventional left bundle branch block. Intraprocedural AV block showed a trend toward persistent pacemaker dependency. Conclusions In this cohort, long-term pacemaker dependency after ASA was unexpectedly low. These findings suggest that AV conduction may recover in a significant proportion of patients, raising the question of whether some may safely avoid PPM implantation. Larger prospective studies are needed to guide device therapy decisions in this population. Our findings challenge the assumption of permanent AV block after ASA and suggest reconsidering routine early device implantation in selected patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lammers et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) (n=67). Alcohol septal ablation with subsequent CIED implantation was evaluated on Pacemaker dependency (>1% ventricular pacing). Long-term pacemaker dependency was observed in only 44.8% of HOCM patients who received a device for AV block after alcohol septal ablation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: