Dapagliflozin combined with sacubitril/valsartan significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction (WMD 3.79; 95% CI 2.70-4.87; p<0.001) and reduced MACE incidence (OR 0.24; p<0.001).
Meta-Analysis (n=1,310)
Does dapagliflozin combined with sacubitril/valsartan improve cardiac function and reduce MACE in patients with heart failure following PCI-treated acute myocardial infarction?
Adding dapagliflozin to sacubitril/valsartan significantly improves echocardiographic parameters, reduces NT-proBNP, and lowers MACE risk in patients with heart failure post-AMI treated with PCI.
Mean Difference: 3.79 (95% CI 2.7–4.87)
p-value: p=< 0.001
Purpose To systematically review the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin and sacubitril/valsartan (SV) in patients with heart failure (HF) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)–treated acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to provide evidence for clinical practice. Methods Seven electronic databases were systematically searched from their inception to July 25, 2024. Following literature screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment, 14 randomized controlled trials involving 1310 patients were included. A meta‐analysis was subsequently conducted using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 18. Results Meta‐analysis results showed that dapagliflozin combined with SV was superior to the control in improving left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (WMD = 3.79, 95% CI: 2.70∼4.87; p < 0.001) and reducing N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) levels (WMD = −83.49, 95% CI: −129.33∼−37.65; p = 0.0004). This combination also significantly reduced left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter (LVEDD) (WMD = −2.27, 95% CI: −3.64∼−0.90; p = 0.001), left ventricular end‐systolic diameter (LVESD) (WMD = −3.29, 95% CI: −3.98∼−2.59; p < 0.001), left ventricular remodeling index (LVRI) (WMD = −0.08, 95% CI: −0.10∼−0.06; p < 0.001), and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (WMD = −8.84, 95% CI: −12.25∼−5.43; p < 0.001), while increasing the 6‐min walking distance (6MWD) (WMD = 51.74, 95% CI: 32.33∼71.14; p < 0.001). Compared with SV monotherapy, adding dapagliflozin reduced major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) incidence (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.15∼0.39; p < 0.001). However, no significant difference in adverse drug events (ADEs) was observed. Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences in NT‐proBNP (WMD = −194.85, 95% CI: −396.53∼6.82; p = 0.06), LVEDD (WMD = −1.50, 95% CI: −3.90∼0.89; p = 0.22), or the incidence of ADE (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.74∼2.14; p = 0.39) when the follow‐up duration was short (≤ 12 w). Additionally, significant heterogeneity was observed across studies for most outcomes. However, this heterogeneity was markedly reduced in the long‐term follow‐up subgroup (≥ 24 w), and the results were consistent with those of previous meta‐analyses. Conclusion Current evidence suggests that early initiation of dapagliflozin combined with SV offers superior efficacy and cardiovascular benefits for patients with HF following PCI‐treated AMI. These benefits become increasingly evident with sustained treatment. Nevertheless, these conclusions warrant validation through more high‐quality evidence.
Tang et al. (Thu,) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure following PCI-treated acute myocardial infarction (n=1,310). Dapagliflozin combined with sacubitril/valsartan vs. Sacubitril/valsartan monotherapy or control was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (WMD 3.79, 95% CI 2.70-4.87, p=< 0.001). Dapagliflozin combined with sacubitril/valsartan significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction (WMD 3.79; 95% CI 2.70-4.87; p<0.001) and reduced MACE incidence (OR 0.24; p<0.001).