Key result
High HFpEF-ABA score linked to ~6.4-fold higher risk of incident heart failure hospitalization.
Why the study?
The HFpEF-ABA score was derived to diagnose HFpEF in symptomatic patients, but its utility as a preventive screening tool to identify preclinical risk in unselected community populations remained unvalidated.
Does the HFpEF-ABA score predict adverse cardiac remodeling and incident heart failure in a community-based population free of baseline heart failure?
Cohort (n=416,374)
Yes
Does the HFpEF-ABA score predict adverse cardiac remodeling and incident heart failure in a community-based population free of baseline heart failure?
The HFpEF-ABA score effectively identifies high-risk individuals for incident heart failure and subclinical adverse cardiac remodeling, supporting its transition from a diagnostic aid to a population-level screening tool.
May support risk stratification in asymptomatic adults; extends HFpEF-ABA score utility beyond diagnosis but leaves clinical adoption open.
INTRODUCTION: The HFpEF-ABA score (age, body mass index, atrial fibrillation) was originally derived to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in symptomatic patients. However, its utility as a preventive screening tool to identify preclinical risk in unselected community populations remains unvalidated.To validate the HFpEF-ABA score in a large community-based cohort free of heart failure and structural heart disease, utilizing a dual validation approach combining cardiac magnetic resonance phenotyping and long-term outcome prediction. METHODS: We analysed 416 374 UK Biobank participants without baseline heart failure. Participants were stratified by HFpEF-ABA score into low, intermediate, and high risk. We assessed biological validity in a subcohort of 65 293 participants utilizing cardiac magnetic resonance, and clinical validity via prospective adjudication of heart failure hospitalization over a median follow-up of 14.9 years. RESULTS: Structurally, elevated scores identified characteristic patterns of adverse cardiac remodelling in individuals at high risk for incident heart failure despite the absence of a clinical diagnosis: high-risk individuals exhibited profound left atrial dysfunction (LA ejection fraction 55.48% vs. 61.92%, P < .001) and distinct concentric ventricular remodelling compared with low-risk participants. Clinically, this structural substrate translated into a 6.4-fold excess risk of incident heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] 6.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.86-7.08, P < .001) and a 3.5-fold increased risk of the composite outcome (P < .001). The score demonstrated robust discrimination, outperforming its individual components. CONCLUSION: The HFpEF-ABA score demonstrates significant prognostic value for identifying individuals at high risk for incident heart failure and is associated with adverse cardiac remodelling and subclinical cardiac changes. These findings support repositioning the score from a diagnostic aid to a population-level screening instrument, supporting earlier identification of high-risk individuals before overt clinical heart failure develops.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Individuals without baseline heart failure or structural heart disease (n=416,374). High HFpEF-ABA score vs. Low HFpEF-ABA score was evaluated on Incident heart failure hospitalization (HR 6.44, 95% CI 5.86-7.08, p=<0.001). A high HFpEF-ABA score was associated with a 6.44-fold increased risk of incident heart failure hospitalization and adverse cardiac remodelling compared to a low score.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: