Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Many will agree with Gareth Evans (1982) that there are what he called Russellian thoughts: thoughts that are about objects and whose contents cannot be specified without reference to those objects. The thought that I express when I say 'I am contemplating my future' is Russellian, and it is plausible that the same would be true of a thought expressed by an utterance of 'This is enjoyable', when the object in question is a visible book, and of a thought expressed by an utterance of 'Michael Innes is J. I. M. Stewart'. But merely to know that the content of my belief that Fido is a dog includes Fido is not yet to know what that content is. According to one view, the content of my belief is a singular whose only constituents are Fido and doghood, a proposition that may be represented by the ordered couple
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephen Schiffer (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: