This paper develops a normative argument for housing as fundamental to human flourishing. It suggests that housing can be seen as a freedom right and is thus on a par with the right to property. The paper proceeds from a brief discussion on the importance of rights to a definition, and then on to a consideration of housing as a freedom right using the work of Waldron and Nussbaum. The argument for housing as a freedom right is based on the situated nature of basic human functioning. These functions are seen as impossible without a place to be. The paper concludes by suggesting, in general terms, the importance of this discussion to housing policy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter King (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: