Key result
A 16-week high-intensity cardioresistance training program significantly increased VO2max (mean difference 2.72; P<0.001) and self-reported physical activity compared to a nonexercise control.
Why the study?
Does a 16-week high-intensity cardioresistance training program improve aerobic fitness and physical activity levels in young and middle-aged adults?
Does a 16-week high-intensity cardioresistance training program improve aerobic fitness and physical activity levels in young and middle-aged adults?
Mean Difference: 2.72
p-value: p=<0.001
A 16-week high-intensity cardioresistance training program significantly improves aerobic fitness, muscular endurance, and self-reported physical activity in young and middle-aged adults.
HICRT may enhance multiple fitness measures in adults; hypothesis-generating pending larger RCTs.
Greenlee, TA, Greene, DR, Ward, NJ, Reeser, GE, Allen, CM, Baumgartner, NW, Cohen, NJ, Kramer, AF, Hillman, CH, and Barbey, AK. Effectiveness of a 16-week high-intensity cardioresistance training program in adults. J Strength Cond Res 31(9): 2528-2541, 2017-The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of a novel, 16-week high-intensity cardioresistance training (HICRT) program on measures of aerobic fitness, agility, aerobic power, muscular endurance, lower-body explosive power, and self-reported activity level. The intervention group (N = 129; 63 f, 24.65 ± 5.55 years) had a baseline V[Combining Dot Above]O2max of 39.83 ± 9.13. These individuals participated in 26, 70-minute exercise sessions, and 4 fitness testing sessions. Participants were matched with a nonexercise control group, paired by sex, age, and baseline V[Combining Dot Above]O2max. Matched controls (N = 129, 63 f, 24.26 ± 5.59 years) had a baseline V[Combining Dot Above]O2max of 39.86 ± 8.59 and completed preintervention and postintervention V[Combining Dot Above]O2max testing only. The results demonstrate that participants in the fitness intervention group significantly increased their V[Combining Dot Above]O2max (2.72 ± 0.31, Mdiff ± SE; p < 0.001) and reported being more physically active (0.42 ± 0.11, Mdiff ± SE; p < 0.001) after the intervention. The matched control group showed no significant pre-post intervention changes. Participants in the fitness intervention showed a significant improvement in 3 of 5 components of the fitness field tests. Specifically, significant improvements were observed for the 1-minute rower (5.32 ± 0.505, Mdiff ± SE; p < 0.001), 1-minute push-up (8.168 ± 0.709, Mdiff ± SE; p < 0.001), and 1.5-mile run tests (1.79 ± 0.169, Mdiff ± SE; p < 0.001). No significant improvements were observed for the shuttle run (p = 0.173) or standing long jump (p = 0.137). These findings demonstrate the efficacy of a novel, HICRT intervention across multiple dimensions of fitness for young- and middle-aged adults. High-intensity cardioresistance training affords flexibility for tailoring to meet desired health and fitness outcomes and makes perceivably daunting high-intensity functional training and multimodal sports training more accessible to general, traditionally nonathletic, populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greenlee et al. (2017) studied Healthy adults (n=258). High-intensity cardioresistance training (HICRT) vs. Nonexercise control was evaluated on VO2max (MD 2.72, p=<0.001). A 16-week high-intensity cardioresistance training program significantly increased VO2max (mean difference 2.72; P<0.001) and self-reported physical activity compared to a nonexercise control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: