Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Subgroup analysis shows high clinical cure rates with Eravacycline for enterococcal infections, indicating its effectiveness.
BACKGROUND: Infections due to Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium are common in the hospital setting and carry a high risk for morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, the incidence of drug-resistant phenotypes, such as vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) and daptomycin non-susceptible strains, is increasing. Eravacycline (ERV) is a novel tetracycline antibiotic approved for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections and possesses a broad spectrum of activity across both Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, including VRE, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. METHODS: We conducted a subgroup analysis assessing the real-world efficacy and safety of ERV for the treatment of enterococcal infections. Adult patients who received ERV for ≥ 72 h for E. faecalis or E. faecium infections were included. The primary outcome of clinical cure was defined as resolution or improvement of infection-related signs and/or symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included in the analysis. E. faecalis and E. faecium were present in 44% and 58% of patients, respectively, and 49% of all isolates were VRE. The most prevalent infection types were intra-abdominal, skin/soft tissue, and osteomyelitis, and a majority (80%) of infections were polymicrobial. Clinical cure was achieved in 77% of patients. Thirty-day mortality was 17% and 30-day infection-related mortality was 12%. Thirty-day hospital readmission rate was 14%, and microbiological recurrence occurred in 4% of patients. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 8% of patients, with 2% of patients requiring discontinuation of ERV. CONCLUSION: This study describes the real-world safety and efficacy of ERV for the treatment of enterococcal infections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Helden et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: