PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 27, 2025Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance6 citationsOpen Access

The efficacy and safety of eravacycline in the treatment of patients with pneumonia in respiratory departments: A real-world multicenter retrospective study

View Full Paper
ZLZhengyu LuoLZLi ZhangZLZhengyin Liu

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Eravacycline (ERV), a novel fluorocycline antibiotic, demonstrates broad-spectrum activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. This multicenter retrospective study evaluates the real-world clinical effectiveness of ERV in treating various infections of the patients hospitalized in the respiratory departments. METHODS: We analyzed 113 adult patients treated with ERV from respiratory departments in China, examining antimicrobial susceptibility profiles and serial laboratory parameters during therapy. Microbiological and clinical outcomes were systematically evaluated at treatment completion and 30-day follow-up. Subgroup analyses focused on Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae infections. RESULTS: ERV exhibited 87.6% clinical efficacy and 85.8% microbiological eradication rate, accompanied by an 85.0% 30-day survival rate. The antibiotic maintained robust activity against MDR pathogens, particularly A. baumannii (n = 51) and K. pneumoniae (n = 27). Adverse events occurred in only 1.8% (2/113) of cases. Clinical outcomes showed no statistically significant differences between monotherapy (n = 70) and combination regimens (n = 43). CONCLUSION: This real-world evidence confirms ERV as an effective and well-tolerated therapeutic option for managing patients in the respiratory departments, particularly those caused by MDR Gram-negative pathogens. The comparable efficacy of monotherapy and combination approaches warrants further investigation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Luo et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5b6c14fe4964b367567885https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2025.09.011
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1In-vitro activities of essential antimicrobial agents including aztreonam/avibactam, eravacycline, colistin and other comparators against carbapenem-resistant bacteria with different carbapenemase genes: A multi-centre study in China, 20212024 · 33 citations
  2. 2Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis2022 · 16,368 citations
  3. 3Clinical epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative sepsis among hospitalized patients: Shifting burden of disease?2018 · 27 citations
  4. 4Nosocomial transmission of tet(x3), blaNDM-1 and blaOXA-97-carrying Acinetobacter baumannii conferring resistance to eravacycline and omadacycline, the Netherlands, March to August 20212024 · 8 citations
  5. 5Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Hospital-acquired, Ventilator-associated, and Healthcare-associated Pneumonia2005 · 5,937 citations