P2Y12 inhibitors, particularly ticagrelor and clopidogrel, may offer protective effects in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia based on non-randomised studies, pending randomised trial results.
Do P2Y12 inhibitors provide a protective effect and improve outcomes in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia?
P2Y12 inhibitors such as ticagrelor show promise as adjunctive therapies for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia, though definitive evidence from randomized trials is still pending.
Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia presents a substantial clinical burden, with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Despite its severity, therapeutic advancements have been small in the past decade, prompting exploration of adjunctive treatment strategies against S aureus bacteraemia. Among these strategies, P2Y12 inhibitors have gained attention due to their potential antistaphylococcal and platelet-modulating effects. Preclinical studies suggest that ticagrelor enhances platelet-mediated bacterial killing and interferes with S aureus metabolism. Clinical data indicate a potential protective effect of ticagrelor in S aureus bacteraemia, as compared with that of clopidogrel. Nevertheless, clopidogrel itself appears to offer protective effects, when compared with no treatment. However, these findings are based exclusively on non-randomised studies conducted in individuals with cardiovascular disease. Two randomised trials currently in development could provide further evidence on the therapeutic role of P2Y12 inhibitors in S aureus bacteraemia. Future research should also focus on preventive strategies and identifying populations at high risk who could benefit from such interventions.
Rando et al. (Fri,) conducted a review in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. P2Y12 inhibitors vs. clopidogrel or no treatment was evaluated. P2Y12 inhibitors, particularly ticagrelor and clopidogrel, may offer protective effects in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia based on non-randomised studies, pending randomised trial results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: