Little bluestem plants ( Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.) Nash) were grown in fumigated and nonfumigated soil under manipulated levels of three inorganic nutrients: nitrogen, phosphorus, or bases (Ca + Mg). Plants grown in nonfumigated soil had significantly ( P < 0.05) higher tissue levels of inorganic nutrients (Cu, Zn, Al, S, Mg, Mn, Ca, and P), smaller shoots, less total biomass, fewer flowering plants but more VAM fungal colonization than plants grown in fumigated soil that were essentially nonmycorrhizal (colonization vs. 1.2 ± 4.9%, for plants grown in nonfumigated and fumigated soil, respectively). Levels of phosphorus (14–33 μ g/g) available (Bray No. 1) in the soil prior to manipulation, which are adequate for little bluestem, likely resulted in the development of an ineffectual mycorrhizal association, which in turn, caused the depressed growth of plants in nonfumigated soil. Among plants grown in nonfumigated soil, there was significant variation in VAM fungal colonization and sporulation owing to nutrient treatment. Nitrogen treatment and deionized water control had significantly lower levels of colonization than phosphorus and base treatments. However, plants in the nitrogen and base treatments had significantly more spores/100 cc of rhizosphere soil than plants grown in the deionized water control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anderson et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: