PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 25, 2020European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery31 citationsOpen Access

Diagnostic approach for myocardial contusion: a retrospective evaluation of patient data and review of the literature

ELEsther M.M. Van LieshoutMVM.H.J. VerhofstadDSDirk Jan T. Van Silfhout

Key Result

A combination of electrocardiography and cardiac biomarkers provides the best diagnostic approach for myocardial contusion following blunt thoracic trauma, whereas echocardiography, chest X-ray, and CT scan have poor sensitivity.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=117)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

What is the sensitivity and specificity of echocardiography, electrocardiography, and cardiac biomarkers for identifying myocardial contusion following blunt thoracic trauma?

P
Population
117 patients with suspected myocardial contusion after blunt thoracic trauma evaluated retrospectively, alongside a meta-analysis of 7,242 patients, to determine the diagnostic accuracy of various tests.
E
Exposure
Diagnostic evaluation using echocardiography, electrocardiography, troponins T and I (TnT and TnI), and creatine kinase muscle/brain (CK-MB)
O
Outcome
Sensitivity and specificity for identifying myocardial contusionsurrogate

A combination of electrocardiography and cardiac biomarkers provides the best diagnostic approach for detecting myocardial contusion after blunt thoracic trauma.

Main Result

Effect estimate: Sensitivity 77% (95% CI 55-92)

Limitations

  • Retrospective nature of the cohort study
  • Lack of a gold standard for diagnosing myocardial contusion in both the cohort study and the literature review
  • Heterogeneity across studies in the meta-analysis due to differences in diagnostic criteria, biomarker cut-off values, and study populations

Abstract

PURPOSE: Myocardial contusion can be a life-threatening condition in patients who sustained blunt thoracic trauma. The diagnostic approach remains a subject of debate. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of echocardiography, electrocardiography, troponins T and I (TnT and TnI), and creatine kinase muscle/brain (CK-MB) for identifying patients with a myocardial contusion following blunt thoracic trauma. METHODS: Sensitivity and specificity were first determined in a 10-year retrospective cohort study and second by a systematic literature review with meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of the 117 patients in the retrospective study, 44 (38%) were considered positive for myocardial contusion. Chest X-ray, chest CT scan, electrocardiograph, and echocardiography had poor sensitivity (< 15%) but good specificity (≥ 90%). Sensitivity to cardiac biomarkers measured at presentation ranged from 59% for TnT to 77% for hs-TnT, specificity ranged from 63% for CK-MB to 100% for TnT. The systematic literature review yielded 28 studies, with 14.5% out of 7242 patients reported as positive for myocardial contusion. The pooled sensitivity of electrocardiography, troponin I, and CK-MB was between 62 and 71%, versus only 45% for echocardiography and 38% for troponin T. The pooled specificity ranged from 63% for CK-MB to 85% for troponin T and 88% for echocardiography. CONCLUSION: The best diagnostic approach for myocardial contusion is a combination of electrocardiography and measurement of cardiac biomarkers. If abnormalities are found, telemonitoring is necessary for the early detection of life-threatening arrhythmias. Chest X-ray and CT scan may show other thoracic injuries but provide no information on myocardial contusion.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lieshout et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Suspected myocardial contusion after blunt thoracic trauma (n=117). Diagnostic tests (electrocardiography, echocardiography, cardiac biomarkers) was evaluated on Sensitivity of high-sensitive troponin T (hs-TnT) at presentation for myocardial contusion (Sensitivity 77%, 95% CI 55-92). A combination of electrocardiography and cardiac biomarkers provides the best diagnostic approach for myocardial contusion following blunt thoracic trauma, whereas echocardiography, chest X-ray, and CT scan have poor sensitivity.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5b86539838a5db88987b2ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01305-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cardiac Troponin I as a Predictor of Arrhythmia and Ventricular Dysfunction in Trauma Patients With Myocardial Contusion2004 · 97 citations
  2. 2EVALUATION OF MYOCARDIAL CONTUSION USING BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS IN CHEST TRAUMA PATIENTS2015 · 1 citations
  3. 3Diagnosis of myocardial contusion in blunt chest trauma1977 · 19 citations
  4. 4Treatments for blunt chest trauma and their impact on patient outcomes and health service delivery2015 · 141 citations
  5. 5Cardiac Troponin I and Myocardial Contusion in the Rabbit2000 · 21 citations