Key result
A combination of electrocardiography and cardiac biomarkers provides the best diagnostic approach for myocardial contusion following blunt thoracic trauma, whereas echocardiography, chest X-ray, and CT scan have poor sensitivity.
Why the study?
Myocardial contusion can be life-threatening following blunt thoracic trauma, but its diagnostic approach remains debated.
What is the sensitivity and specificity of echocardiography, electrocardiography, and cardiac biomarkers for identifying myocardial contusion following blunt thoracic trauma?
Cohort (n=117)
No
What is the sensitivity and specificity of echocardiography, electrocardiography, and cardiac biomarkers for identifying myocardial contusion following blunt thoracic trauma?
A combination of electrocardiography and cardiac biomarkers provides the best diagnostic approach for detecting myocardial contusion after blunt thoracic trauma.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Biomarkers offer moderate sensitivity for myocardial contusion detection; leaves open optimal diagnostic strategy pending prospective validation.
PURPOSE: Myocardial contusion can be a life-threatening condition in patients who sustained blunt thoracic trauma. The diagnostic approach remains a subject of debate. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of echocardiography, electrocardiography, troponins T and I (TnT and TnI), and creatine kinase muscle/brain (CK-MB) for identifying patients with a myocardial contusion following blunt thoracic trauma. METHODS: Sensitivity and specificity were first determined in a 10-year retrospective cohort study and second by a systematic literature review with meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of the 117 patients in the retrospective study, 44 (38%) were considered positive for myocardial contusion. Chest X-ray, chest CT scan, electrocardiograph, and echocardiography had poor sensitivity (< 15%) but good specificity (≥ 90%). Sensitivity to cardiac biomarkers measured at presentation ranged from 59% for TnT to 77% for hs-TnT, specificity ranged from 63% for CK-MB to 100% for TnT. The systematic literature review yielded 28 studies, with 14.5% out of 7242 patients reported as positive for myocardial contusion. The pooled sensitivity of electrocardiography, troponin I, and CK-MB was between 62 and 71%, versus only 45% for echocardiography and 38% for troponin T. The pooled specificity ranged from 63% for CK-MB to 85% for troponin T and 88% for echocardiography. CONCLUSION: The best diagnostic approach for myocardial contusion is a combination of electrocardiography and measurement of cardiac biomarkers. If abnormalities are found, telemonitoring is necessary for the early detection of life-threatening arrhythmias. Chest X-ray and CT scan may show other thoracic injuries but provide no information on myocardial contusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lieshout et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Suspected myocardial contusion after blunt thoracic trauma (n=117). Diagnostic tests (electrocardiography, echocardiography, cardiac biomarkers) was evaluated on Sensitivity of high-sensitive troponin T (hs-TnT) at presentation for myocardial contusion (Sensitivity 77%, 95% CI 55-92). A combination of electrocardiography and cardiac biomarkers provides the best diagnostic approach for myocardial contusion following blunt thoracic trauma, whereas echocardiography, chest X-ray, and CT scan have poor sensitivity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: