Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
When the curvature of a surface that is to be made frequency selective is not small, it modifies the array lattice and element geometry, altering the transmission performance of the surface. For a given degree of curvature, small unit cells are distorted less. The transmission response of a typical array of conducting elements has a main reflection resonance at a wavelength λ1, with further nulls at shorter wavelengths. We have attempted to reduce the unit cell dimension p as much as possible for a given reflection wavelength λ1, thereby increasing its separation from grating responses. The ratio λ1/p has been used as a figure of merit. An array of linear dipoles on a square lattice of side p is a standard of comparison, a typical case giving a figure of merit of 1.6. A Jerusalem cross array gives a value of about 4.5. By convoluting the conductors of a square loop element, or by using, as the array elements, the low order generations of space filling curves, such as that described by Hilbert, we have obtained values of λ1/p in the range 7–12. The unit cell areas are lower than that of the dipole standard by factors averaging about 40.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parker et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: