Key result
The 33-item Self-management Capability, Support and Motivation-Behaviour scale demonstrated good reliability with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.867 and acceptable construct validity for evaluating elderly hypertensive patients.
Why the study?
Most evaluation tools for self-management in elderly hypertensive patients lack a theoretical basis and wide applicability, limiting intervention effectiveness.
Cross-Sectional (n=430)
Yes
The newly developed COM-B based self-management scale for elderly hypertensive patients demonstrates good reliability and validity for clinical use.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid self-management assessment in elderly hypertensives; leaves open longitudinal validation before clinical integration.
BACKGROUND: Using accurate assessment tools to assess patients in clinical practice is important to mining influencing factors and implementing interventions. However, most evaluation tools for the self-management of elderly patients with hypertension lack a theoretical basis and wide applicability, which makes the intervention effect insignificant. METHODS: Based on the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model, combined with literature review and qualitative research, a questionnaire item pool was initially formulated; then the initial items were screened and adjusted through expert consultation and pre-testing to form an initial scale. A field survey of 450 elderly hypertensive patients was then performed using the initial scale to test the reliability and validity of the scale. Cronbach's alpha, test-retest reliability and composite reliability were used to test the reliability of the scale, and the validity of the scale was evaluated from two aspects: content validity and construct validity. The evaluation results of the content validity of the scale by experts were used as the content validity index; the results of exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used as the structural validity index to further verify the model structure of the scale and develop a formal scale. RESULTS: The final self-management scale included 4 dimensions and 33 items. The Scale-Content Validity Index was 0.920. Exploratory factor analysis extracted four factors that explained 71.3% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha of the formal scale was 0.867, test-retest reliability was 0.894, and composite reliability of the 4 dimensions were within 0.943 ~ 0.973. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the scale had good construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: The Self-management Capability, Support and Motivation-Behaviour scale for elderly hypertensive patients has good reliability and validity, providing a tool for medical staff to evaluate the self-management level of elderly hypertensive patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=430). Self-management Capability, Support and Motivation-Behaviour scale was evaluated on Scale reliability and validity. The 33-item Self-management Capability, Support and Motivation-Behaviour scale demonstrated good reliability with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.867 and acceptable construct validity for evaluating elderly hypertensive patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: