// Zhengbo Song 1,2 , Xinmin Yu 1,2 , Zhiyong Shi 1,2 , Jun Zhao 1,2 and Yiping Zhang 1,2 1 Department of Medical Oncology , Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China 2 Key Laboratory Diagnosis and Treatment Technology on Thoracic Oncology, Hangzhou, China Correspondence to: Yiping Zhang, email: // Keywords : non-small cell lung cancer, HER2 mutation, prevalence, genetic variability, treatment Received : November 14, 2015 Accepted : July 27, 2016 Published : August 16, 2016 Abstract Background: ERBB2 ( HER2 ) is a driver gene identified in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The prevalence, clinicopathology, genetic variability and treatment of HER2 -positive NSCLC in Chinese population are unclear. Patients and Methods: Eight hundred and fifty-nine patients with pathologically confirmed NSCLC were screened for HER2 mutations using Sanger sequencing. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed in positive cases. HER2 amplification was detected with FISH. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared with log-rank tests. Results: Twenty-one cases carrying HER2 mutations were identified with a prevalence of 2.4%. HER2 mutations were more frequently encountered in females, non-smokers and adenocarcinoma. NGS was performed in 19 out of 21 patients, The results showed 16 cases with additional genetic aberrations, most commonly associated with TP53 ( n = 6), followed by EGFR ( n = 3), NF1 ( n = 3), KRAS ( n = 2) and other mutations. One patient harbored HER2 amplification. Four patients with stage IV received afatinib treatment, and three showed stable disease with a median progression-free survival of 4 months and one patient was diagnosed with progressive disease. Conclusion: HER2 mutations represent a distinct subset of NSCLC. NGS showed that HER2 mutations commonly co-existed with other driver genes. Afatinib treatment displayed moderate efficacy in patients with HER2 mutations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: