Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Despite the increase in women's participation in sport, women remain underrepresented in leadership roles across the global sport landscape. In response, governments and sport organisations have developed Women's Leadership Programs (WLPs) to foster women's development in sports leadership. Although these initiatives aim to strengthen women's confidence and leadership capabilities, existing evaluations often focus on programme structure rather than the relational processes through which women navigate, adapt to, and challenge gendered sport systems. This study examines one such WLP: New Era (SportsPro), a 12-month global programme integrating mentoring, leadership development, visibility opportunities, and community-building for women and non-binary sport executives and emerging leaders. Methods: A qualitative research design was employed using semi-structured interviews with 21 participants, including 13 programme alumni and eight Steering Group members. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis, combining manual and AI-assisted coding. Results: Findings were organised across (1) programme development and engagement, which captured the evolution of New Era, participants' motivations for engaging, and the logistical and organisational conditions shaping participation. And (2) processes and perceived impacts of New Era, which captured the relational, personal, and industry-level experiences associated with participation. Across these points, participants described New Era as a relationally rich programme that supported visibility, expanded networks, personal brand development, leadership identity, and career progression. However, geographical barriers, uneven engagement, and ambiguity around programme goals constrained participation and raised questions about how to evaluate longer-term impact. Discussion: New Era illustrates the potential of relational, identity-based, and visibility-oriented leadership development to support women's leadership journeys in sport. Its contribution lies not only in individual development but in creating conditions for connection, recognition, and collective influence. However, broader organisational and sector-level impacts were harder to evidence or attribute directly to the programme. Future evaluations should adopt longitudinal and multi-level designs to assess whether perceived benefits translate into sustained career progression and organisational change across sport leadership.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fortnum et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: