Evaluates acute toxicity of palladium(II) complexes in aquatic and plant models, suggesting low toxicity levels.
A series of palladium(II) complexes, [Pd(L 1 ) 2 ] ( 1 ), [Pd(L 2 ) 2 ]·2DMSO ( 2 ), [Pd(L 3 ) 2 ] ( 3 ), [Pd(L 4 )(CH 3 COO) 2 ] ( 4 ), [Pd(L 5 ) 2 ]·1.25H 2 O ( 5 ), and [Pd(L 6 ) 2 ] ( 6 ) with Schiff bases derived from 4‐aminoantipyrine, HL 1 – HL 6 , have been synthesized. The newly obtained ligands and corresponding complexes have been described using the following physicochemical methods: 1 H‐NMR, 13 C‐NMR, UV–vis, IR spectroscopies, elemental analysis, magnetic susceptibility, molar conductivity, and thermal analysis. Additionally, the molecular structures of ligands HL 1 , HL 3 , and HL 6 and complexes 1 , 2 , 3, and 6 were confirmed by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. All crystal structures were found to be centrosymmetric, with no interstitial solvent molecules, except for [Pd(L 2 ) 2 ]·2DMSO, which crystallized as a disolvate from DMSO. Furthermore, this analysis showed that each palladium(II) is coordinated by a set of four N 2 O 2 donor atoms, adopting a square‐planar geometry. The acute toxicity of all compounds was assessed on two species: the monocot Triticum aestivum L. and the aquatic crustacean Artemia franciscana Kellogg. The results from macroscopic and microscopic plant evaluations confirmed the absence of a phytotoxic effect for the ligands and indicated a weak effect for complexes 2 ‐ 6 . In addition, most of the tested compounds did not induce mortality in crustacean nauplii at concentrations up to 100 µM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ștefan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: