Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The pitfalls of conventional chemotherapy, including poor solubility, off-target toxicity, and multidrug resistance, have driven the development of nanoparticle-based delivery systems. Here, we report the facile one-pot synthesis of lapatinib-encapsulated zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (LAP@ZIF-8) nanoparticles. The formulation achieved an encapsulation efficiency of 72.4% and a drug loading capacity of 6.6%. Comprehensive physicochemical characterization confirmed uniform hexagonal morphology (SEM), favorable hydrodynamic size (236 ± 2 nm; DLS), positive surface charge (+29 mV; ζ-potential), high crystallinity (XRD), and excellent thermal stability (TGA). LAP release was pH-responsive, with ∼77% cumulative release at pH 5.5 (tumor-mimicking) versus 43% at pH 7.4 after 96 h. Serum–protein binding (<11%) and hemolysis (<2%) assays demonstrated good biocompatibility. In vitro, LAP@ZIF-8 exhibited potent, selective cytotoxicity toward HER2-positive SK-BR-3 breast-cancer cells (72 h IC 50 = 1.2 μg mL –1 ) while sparing HER2-negative MCF-7 cells. Importantly, both free LAP and LAP@ZIF-8 were well-tolerated by nontumorigenic MCF-10A mammary epithelial cells: viability remained ≥90% at ≤1 μg mL –1 and exceeded 50% even at 100 μg mL –1, indicating that the IC 50 was not reached and providing a preliminary safety window for healthy tissues. Beyond its anticancer effects, the nanocarrier displayed broad-spectrum antibacterial activity (minimum bactericidal concentrations: 5 mg mL –1 for Staphylococcus aureus and 10 mg mL –1 for Escherichia coli ) and moderate antioxidant capacity (DPPH IC 50 = 666 μg mL –1 ). Collectively, these results position LAP@ZIF-8 as a versatile, pH-sensitive platform that combines selective anticancer efficacy with low toxicity to healthy cells alongside ancillary antibacterial and antioxidant properties suitable for multimodal therapy.
Aslan et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: