This paper estimates the macroeconomic effects of social transfer payments to individuals for a sample of 23 developed and Latin American countries. On impact, the social transfer multiplier is 0.3 in developed countries, but 0.9 in Latin American economies. Hand-to-mouth consumers, who have no access to financial markets and a high marginal propensity to consume, play a key role to explain the heterogeneity in the size of social transfer multipliers. Survey-based data from the Global Findex dataset show that the average share of the population living hand-to-mouth is 23 percent in developed economies versus 60 percent in Latin American countries. Using a two-agent New Keynesian model, the difference in the share of hand-to-mouth consumers is able to explain 80 percent of the difference in the estimated social transfer multipliers. The share of hand-to-mouth individuals in emerging countries is in general 47 percent, which suggests that a larger social transfer multiplier may be expected for this type of economy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bracco et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: