Key result
Compliance with the ERAS protocol improved significantly over time (65% in group 1, 83.9% in group 2, and 89.6% in group 3) and showed an inverse correlation with length of hospital stay.
Why the study?
Does implementation and compliance with the ERAS protocol improve length of stay and complication rates in patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer?
Population
92 patients with colorectal cancer submitted to laparoscopic resection during the years 2013-2014.
Comparison
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol… vs Subgroups based on time from ERAS protocol…
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
Higher ERAS compliance may shorten stays but should not yet change practice; leaves open causality and generalizability.
Cohort (n=92)
Does implementation and compliance with the ERAS protocol improve length of stay and complication rates in patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer?
Implementation of the ERAS protocol is a gradual process, and higher compliance correlates with shorter length of hospital stay.
Pędziwiatr et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Colorectal cancer (n=92). ERAS protocol implementation over time vs. Earlier vs later implementation subgroups was evaluated on Compliance with the ERAS protocol, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and readmission rate. Compliance with the ERAS protocol improved significantly over time (65% in group 1, 83.9% in group 2, and 89.6% in group 3) and showed an inverse correlation with length of hospital stay.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: