Compliance with the ERAS protocol improved significantly over time (65% in group 1, 83.9% in group 2, and 89.6% in group 3) and showed an inverse correlation with length of hospital stay.
Cohort (n=92)
Does implementation and compliance with the ERAS protocol improve length of stay and complication rates in patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer?
Implementation of the ERAS protocol is a gradual process, and higher compliance correlates with shorter length of hospital stay.
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol in colorectal surgery allows shortening length of hospital stay and reducing complication rate. Despite the clear guidelines and conclusive evidence their full implementation and putting them into daily practice meets certain difficulties, especially in the early stage. The aim of the study was to analyse the course of implementation of the ERAS protocol into daily practice on the basis of adherence to the protocol. Group included 92 patients (43F/49M) with colorectal cancer submitted to laparoscopic resection during the years 2013-2014. Perioperative care in all of them based on ERAS protocol consisting of 16 items. Its principles and discharge criteria were based on the guidelines of the ERAS Society guidelines. The entire analysed group of patients was divided into 3 subgroups (30 patients) depending on the time from ERAS protocol implementation. We analysed the compliance with the protocol and its influence on length of hospital stay, postoperative complications and readmission rate in different subgroups. The average compliance with the protocol differed significantly between groups and was 65% in group 1, 83.9% in group 2 and 89.6% in group 3. The compliance with subsequent protocol elements was different. The length of stay and complication rate was statistically different in analysed subgroups. The whole group demonstrated an inverse correlation between compliance and length of stay. This analysis leads to the conclusion that the introduction of the ERAS protocol is a gradual process, and its compliance at the level of 80% or more requires at least 30 patients and the period of about 6 months. The initial derogation from the assumed proceedings is inevitable and should not discourage further action. Particular emphasis in the initial stage should be put on continuous training of personnel of all specialties and continuous evaluation of the results.
Pędziwiatr et al. (Wed,) conducted a cohort in Colorectal cancer (n=92). ERAS protocol implementation over time vs. Earlier vs later implementation subgroups was evaluated on Compliance with the ERAS protocol, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and readmission rate. Compliance with the ERAS protocol improved significantly over time (65% in group 1, 83.9% in group 2, and 89.6% in group 3) and showed an inverse correlation with length of hospital stay.