Key result
Surgical intervention alleviated signs and symptoms in a 44-year-old man with primary malignant pericardial mesothelioma, though he died 7 months after surgery.
Why the study?
Primary malignant pericardial mesothelioma is a rare, lethal tumor that is very difficult to diagnose, with patients usually having progressed by the time of referral.
Case Report (n=1)
Primary malignant pericardial mesothelioma has a dismal prognosis, and surgical intervention should be carefully considered except for alleviating immediate life-threatening conditions like cardiac tamponade.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Emphasizes diagnostic challenges in rare pericardial mesothelioma; leaves open need for better detection strategies in advanced cases.
INTRODUCTION: Primary malignant pericardial mesothelioma is a rare tumor that is very difficult to diagnose. Furthermore, it is a lethal disease, because patients usually have progressed at the time of referral. PRESENTATION OF THE CASE: We report a 44-year-old man with primary malignant pericardial mesothelioma. He was referred to our hospital for the diagnosis and treatment of a massive pericardial effusion and huge tumor. Pericardiocentesis was performed, but we could not obtain definitive diagnosis, and the cardiac tamponade continued along with the signs/symptoms. He required surgical intervention for the diagnosis and treatment. After surgery, his signs/symptoms improved. He received adjuvant therapy, although he died 7 months after surgery. DISCUSSION: Primary malignant pericardial mesothelioma is a rare tumor. The most common signs and symptoms are related to constriction of the heart by the tumor and/or effusion. Even if the pericardial fluid specimen obtained by pericardiocentesis is negative for malignant cells, primary malignant pericardial mesothelioma should be included in the differential diagnosis. Because the malignancy is usually advanced at the time of diagnosis, it has been difficult to cure. Radiation and chemotherapy have been used in addition to surgery, but have been minimally effective. CONCLUSION: The outcome of our patient with pericardial malignant mesothelioma was dismal. The indications for surgical intervention should be carefully considered except for critical cases requiring alleviation of immediate life-threating conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsuyama et al. (2020) conducted a case report in Primary malignant pericardial mesothelioma (n=1). Surgical intervention was evaluated. Surgical intervention alleviated signs and symptoms in a 44-year-old man with primary malignant pericardial mesothelioma, though he died 7 months after surgery.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: