Key result
The median life span of different veno-venous ECMO systems was 9 days, with no significant difference in life span observed among the various systems.
Why the study?
Does the type of vvECMO system affect the life span until the first exchange in patients with severe respiratory failure?
Observational (n=139)
No
Does the type of vvECMO system affect the life span until the first exchange in patients with severe respiratory failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Different vvECMO systems have a similar median life span of 9 days before requiring exchange, indicating comparable performance for acute respiratory failure.
Over the past decade, veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO) has been increasingly utilized in respiratory failure in patients. This study presents our institution´s experience focusing on the life span of ECMO systems reflecting the performance of a particular system. A retrospective review of our ECMO database identified 461 adult patients undergoing vvECMO (2010-2017). Patients that required more than one system and survived the first exchange >24 hours (n = 139) were included. Life span until the first exchange and exchange criteria were analyzed for all systems (PLS, Cardiohelp HLS-set, both Maquet Cardiopulmonary, Rastatt, Germany; Deltastream/Hilite7000LT, iLA-activve, Xenios/NovaLung, Heilbronn, Germany; ECC.O5, LivaNova, Mirandola, Italy). At our ECMO center, the frequency of a system exchange was 30%. The median (IQR) life span was 9 (6-12) days. There was no difference regarding the different systems (p = 0.145 and p = 0.108, respectively). However, the Deltastream systems were exchanged more frequently due to elective technical complications (e. g. worsened gas transfer, development of coagulation disorder, increased bleedings complications) compared to the other exchanged systems (p = 0.013). In summary, the used ECMO systems are safe and effective for acute respiratory failure. There is no evidence for the usage of a specific system. Only the increased predictability of an imminent exchange preferred the usage of a Deltastream system. However, the decision to use a particular system should not depend solely on the possible criteria for an exchange.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Philipp et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Severe respiratory failure (n=139). Different ECMO systems (PLS, Cardiohelp, Deltastream, iLA-activve, ECC.O5) vs. Compared to each other was evaluated on Life span of the ECMO system until the first exchange (p=0.108). The median life span of different veno-venous ECMO systems was 9 days, with no significant difference in life span observed among the various systems.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: