Key result
Spatial multicriteria analysis identifies high-risk ASFV zones across Russia, eastern China, and Southeast Asia.
Why the study?
Prevalence and transmission of African swine fever virus between domestic pigs and wild boars may be underestimated in Asia due to high wild boar populations, limited wildlife surveillance, and inadequate farm biosecurity.
Observational
Yes
Spatial multicriteria analysis identifies high-risk regions for African Swine Fever transmission among domestic pigs and wild boars in Asia, aiding targeted surveillance strategies.
May inform targeted surveillance in identified high-risk zones; leaves open the need for prospective validation.
African swine fever (ASF) is a highly lethal disease affecting domestic pigs and wild boars, caused by the ASF virus (ASFV), which has rapidly spread across Asia in recent years. In this region, most reported ASF cases involve domestic pigs, while cases in wild boars remain notably lower except in a few countries. However, factors such as the high population of wild boars, limited wildlife surveillance, and inadequate farm biosecurity suggest that the prevalence and transmission of ASFV between these hosts may be underestimated. Therefore, we used a simplified multicriteria approach (SMCA) to identify vulnerable areas (VAs) for ASFV infection and validated the resulting VA maps with chi-square tests using reported ASF cases. The spatial SMCA revealed that VAs for ASFV infection in domestic pigs are concentrated in eastern China, while high-risk zones for ASFV infection in wild boars span Russia, eastern China, and Southeast Asia. Sensitity analysis showed that the variables that most influenced the risk of ASFV infection in domestic pigs and wild boars were anthropogenic factors and distribution of wild boars, respectively. Additionally, we predicted areas with significant transmission potential between domestic pigs and wild boars. High-risk regions for interspecies transmission include eastern China, southwestern Korea, and southern Japan. This study offers a standardized method to assess ASFV infection risk across Asia by integrating environmental and anthropogenic factors rather than relying solely on reported outbreaks. The findings highlight potential high-risk regions, including those without detected outbreaks, to improve surveillance and early detection strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawaguchi et al. (2025) conducted an observational in African swine fever (ASF). Environmental and anthropogenic factors was evaluated on Vulnerable areas (VAs) for ASFV infection. Spatial multicriteria analysis identified high-risk zones for African swine fever infection in domestic pigs in eastern China, and in wild boars across Russia, eastern China, and Southeast Asia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: