Key result
Integrated kidney supportive care improves quality of life and reduces symptom burden versus conventional care.
Why the study?
Kidney failure carries a high symptom burden and diminished quality of life, but data on the effects of kidney supportive care and advance care planning from developing countries are scarce.
Does integrated kidney supportive care improve quality of life, symptom burden, and advance care planning engagement in adult patients with kidney failure?
RCT
block randomisation
No
Does integrated kidney supportive care improve quality of life, symptom burden, and advance care planning engagement in adult patients with kidney failure?
p-value: p=<0.01
Integrated kidney supportive care significantly improves quality of life, reduces symptom burden, and enhances advance care planning engagement in patients with end-stage kidney disease.
Supports routine KSC integration in nephrology for kidney failure; extends RCT evidence to developing countries where data were scarce.
Background Kidney failure is linked to a substantial symptom burden and diminished quality of life (QoL). The incorporation of kidney supportive care (KSC) and advance care planning (ACP) into routine nephrology practices could enhance patient-centred outcomes; however, data from developing countries are scarce. This study evaluated the effects of KSC versus standard care on quality of life, symptom burden, and ACP engagement in kidney failure. Methods This randomised controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in India (June 2023–June 2025) with ethics approval (IEC-214/2021) and CTRI registration (CTRI/2021/06/034179). Adult patients with kidney failure were randomised using block randomisation to receive either integrated kidney supportive care (KSC) or conventional care. Outcomes, including quality of life, symptom burden, and ACP engagement, were assessed at baseline and at 2, 4, and 6 months using the ESAS-r Renal, EQ-5D-5L, and an advance care planning questionnaire. Results Patients in the intervention group showed significant improvements across multiple domains, with QoL scores increasing markedly (p < 0.01) and symptom burden decreasing significantly (p < 0.01) compared with baseline and the control group. Additionally, the patients' willingness to engage in ACP discussions and document increased substantially in the KSC group, which was accompanied by a significantly higher rate of CPR refusal and a reduced willingness for ventilator or ICU admission (p < 0.01). Conclusion Integrated KSC improves quality of life, reduces symptom burden, and enhances ACP engagement. These findings support integrating structured KSC into routine kidney care in developing settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naik et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in kidney failure. Integrated kidney supportive care (KSC) vs. conventional care was evaluated on quality of life, symptom burden, and ACP engagement (p=<0.01). Integrated kidney supportive care significantly improved quality of life and reduced symptom burden (p < 0.01) compared with conventional care in patients with kidney failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: