Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clarifications are provided with respect to two sets of issues raised in preceding commentaries. First, interaction effects are undoubtedly salient in resilience research; yet main effect findings can be equally critical from an intervention perspective. Second, although resilience research and prevention science reflect similar broad objectives, the former (but not usually the latter) involves explicit attention to positive adjustment outcomes in addition to the avoidance of psychopathology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luthar et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: