Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the CO2 capture process, decreasing the energy consumption and increasing the desorption rate of loaded MEA-CO2 during the regeneration process of monoethanol amine have been identified as major challenges that need to be addressed. To overcome these challenges, three modified heterogeneous mesoporous catalysts, CMK-3-SiO2, CMK-3-MCM-41, and CMK-3-SBA-15, and a SO42–/ZrO2 solid acid catalyst were initially synthesized and investigated to determine their catalytic effectiveness in the process of CO2 and MEA solvent regeneration with a CO2 loading of 0.5 ± 0.02 mol CO2/mol MEA at 97 °C. According to the experimental results, the CMK-3-modified catalyst significantly decreased the energy requirement for CO2 desorption. The catalytic performance of the synthesized catalysts was in the order of CMK-3-SiO2 > CMK-3-MCM-41 > CMK-3-SBA-15 > SZ. CMK-3-SiO2 exhibited the best catalytic performance by enhancing the desorption rate by 195%, and decreasing the energy requirement by 37.41% compared to monoethanol amine as a blank run. Furthermore, the CMK-3-SiO2 catalyst exhibited the best catalytic performance compared to the literature with excellent stability and no unfavorable effects on the MEA-CO2 absorption activity for the regenerated amine solvent. This performance seems to be a result of the large mesoporous surface area (BET) and the large number of Brϕnsted and Lewis acid sites. In addition, a reasonable reaction mechanism for amine solvent regeneration with the CMK-3 heterogeneous catalyst is proposed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bairq et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: