Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Viewpoint discusses ribavirin as post-exposure prophylaxis for Andes virus exposure, suggesting careful consideration due to limited evidence.
Andes virus (ANDV) is unique among hantaviruses because person-to-person transmission is possible. This raises questions on the relevance of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), particularly following high-risk household, healthcare-associated, or laboratory exposures, considering its high case fatality rate. Ribavirin has demonstrated antiviral activity against hantaviruses in vitro and in animal models, although clinical evidence supporting its use for ANDV remains extremely limited. This viewpoint summarises the currently available evidence regarding ribavirin as PEP after potential ANDV exposure. We discuss the knowledge gaps that may limit the applicability of ribavirin PEP, to make informed decisions on the use of ribavirin in the setting of PEP. Potential dosing strategies are visualised by modelling and simulation, and potential dose and duration are discussed. Although the biological rationale for ribavirin PEP appears compelling, absence of controlled human studies and potential toxicity currently limit its role to highly selected exposure scenarios and use shortly after exposure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brüggemann et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: