Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Argues for a systemic overhaul of trauma-informed care, emphasizing justice-oriented models to address inequalities.
The transition to Trauma-Informed Care (TIC) has beneficially shifted clinical discourse from ‘What's wrong with you?’ to ‘What has happened to you?’ However, contemporary critique suggests that TIC has reached a ‘glass ceiling’. By remaining tethered to medicalised, deficit-based paradigms, TIC often frames individuals through a lens of permanent ‘brokenness’, while neglecting the sociopolitical factors – such as systemic inequality – that perpetuate distress. This paper argues for a systemic overhaul of UK institutional practices. It concludes that genuine recovery requires transcending trauma-informed awareness towards adopting a holistic, justice-oriented model. This approach restores not only the mind, but also the individual's sense of belonging and purpose within the social fabric, thereby replacing trauma capital with collective agency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janine Ewen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: