Assessing the Acceptability of a Wearable Versus Implantable Device for Overdose Detection and Naloxone Administration: Perspectives from Individuals in the Addiction Workforce and Individuals with a History of Opioid Use

BACKGROUND: Use of medical devices for overdose detection and intervention are important for reducing overdose deaths; however, uptake and adoption has been slow. This study explores acceptability of a preclinical wearable versus implantable device, that detects overdose-induced respiratory failure and administers naloxone, among people who use opioids (PWUO) and individuals in the addiction treatment workforce. METHODS: = 126 individuals in the addiction workforce (81% female; 81% White; 13.5% prescribers). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest acceptability of a device for overdose detection and naloxone administration among PWUO and the addiction workforce, with more acceptability for a wearable versus implantable device. Individual differences should be considered in further testing and dissemination of such devices.