Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ex-vivo study evaluates bond strength of epoxy and bioceramic sealers with medicaments, suggesting no improvement with nano-chitosan addition.
Background The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of intracanal medicaments—calcium hydroxide (CH) and calcium hydroxide/nano-chitosan (CH/NC)—on the push-out bond strength (POBS) of AH Plus (AHP) and NeoSEALER Flo (NSF). Methods Nano-chitosan (NC) characterization was done using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS) and zeta potential analysis. Sixty extracted maxillary central incisors were instrumented up to X5 (50/0.06). Based on intracanal medicament used, specimens were allocated into three groups ( n = 20): Group I; no intracanal medicament (control), Group II; (CH), and Group III; (CH/NC). Intracanal medicaments were removed after one week of incubation. Each group was subdivided based on sealer used ( n = 10): subgroup A (AHP) and subgroup B (NSF). Obturation was performed with cold lateral compaction. After one week of incubation, roots were sectioned and a universal testing machine was used to evaluate POBS. Three-way ANOVA and Chi-square tests were conducted at 0.05 significance level. Results TEM showed mostly spherical NC particles with diameters less than 50 nm. DLS analysis revealed a hydrodynamic Z-average diameter of 62.4 nm with a polydispersity index of 0.195. Zeta potential analysis demonstrated a positive surface charge of + 47.57 mV. The “medication” factor, “medication/sealer”, “medication/root level” and “sealer/root level” interactions significantly affected POBS ( P < 0.05). Neither “sealer” nor “root level” factors significantly affected POBS ( P > 0.05). Pooled POBS data revealed that: IA and IB subgroups were significantly higher than IIA, IIB, IIIA and IIIB subgroups ( P < 0.05). Regarding failure mode, tested subgroups showed no significant difference ( P > 0.05). Conclusions Under the conditions of this study, prior application of CH or CH/NC reduced POBS for both sealers compared with controls. The addition of NC to CH did not provide a statistically significant improvement in POBS compared to CH alone. Overall, AHP and NSF demonstrated comparable POBS to root canal dentin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghozi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: